Refunds, Anyone? Not if 6A Can Help It   
12:36am 09/08/2007
  This, this right the fuck here is why they're not making the new "clarifications" part of the ToS. NOW it all makes sense.

Quoted from [info]raaven: California law (thanks to a rep at the California State Attorney's office I spoke to) is absolutely clear as a bell. If a service provider changes the Terms of Service, they must notify their customers individually of this change, and they must refund monies paid by those customers if they choose to terminate their relationship. This, ladies and gentlemen, is why 6A/LJ will not make their new "policies" part of the Terms of Service. Instead, they present it as "policy", and enforce it illegally, because they are counting on the very real fact that most of the affected users do not live in California and will not go to the trouble of filing a claim or a complaint with the proper authorities.

Full article at the link above.

I have SOOO many more links to post tomorrow. But for now, bed. IF I can sleep after this.
 
    Post